Relevancy discussion
The policies of a small-mid sized data recovery company really don't seem like something that is notable enough for an article. doesn't matter if we like the guy Keith (talk) 22:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Keith This article directly serves the wiki's mission by exposing the gap between headline marketing and fine-print reality.
- While the business prominently markets a "No Data, No Fee" guarantee, the article details the "hidden" exceptions where consumers still have to pay even if they get zero data back, such as non-refundable deposits for donor parts, software locks, or pre-wiped devices. Documenting these specific loopholes helps protect consumers from being misled by flashy industry marketing. Anonymous257 (talk) 23:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Adding onto what Keith said, it is important we do not "glaze" companies which is mentioned in our pro-consumer article draft policy. It is still a draft, but that rule would most likely stay consistent with the final copy. In addition, it is a conflict of interest to have Rossmann Repair Group mentioned in a positive light on this wiki, as the founder is Louis himself. The RRG website most likely already mentions these loopholes. Mr Pollo (talk) 23:59, 12 July 2026 (UTC)