CRW

Home Wiki

Unlocking Technology Act of 2013

View on consumerrights.wiki ↗

Work in progress
This article has been flagged for additional work. Treat its claims as provisional.
Stub
This article is a stub. The wiki community is still building it out.
Contents3
  1. Background
  2. The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013
  3. References

❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub

This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼

Issues may include:

  • This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
  • This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
  • More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
  • The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
  • The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content

How you can help:

  • Add documented examples with verifiable sources
  • Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
  • Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
  • Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
  • Flesh out the article with relevant information

This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.

The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 was a proposed bipartisan law which would have modified Section 1201 of the DMCA to only restrict breaking digital locks for the sake of copyright infringement.[1] It died in committee.[2]

Background

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Section 1201 was a law passed which was intended to prevent copyright infringement by making it illegal to break a digital lock (meaning bypass software restrictions put on a smart device). Companies have been making their devices smart partially to use this law to prevent people from modifying their products.

The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013

Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced this bill to allow people to break digital locks on devices they purchased as long as it was not intended for copyright infringement. If passed, this law would have allowed for jailbreaking, servicing vehicles, ripping CDs, and more. [3] The bill was assigned to the Ways and Means Committee on May 8, 2013. That committee had done nothing on the bill by December 18, 2013, so it was reassigned to the Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet subcommittee, which also did nothing with it.[2]


References

  1. ↑ Couts, Andrew (2013-05-09). "Awesome new bill legalizes cell phone unlocking, 'fixes' the DMCA". Digital Trends. Archived from the original on 2026-02-13. Retrieved 2026-02-24.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 "H.R. 1892 (113th): Unlocking Technology Act of 2013". www.GovTrack.us. 2013. Retrieved 2016-02-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ↑ Lee, Timothy (2013-05-09). "Members of Congress finally introduce serious DMCA reform". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2026-02-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Filed under