Relevancy
I’m not sure this article is relevant enough to be on the wiki. I hate to say it, but people would probably use AI to gather the contact information over using this article. Mr Pollo (talk) 13:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- I do not consider it relevant nor useful here on CRW, as well.
- Not comparable to contacts to governmental agencies that are specifically for consumer issues, regulations, etcetera.
- Much more susceptible to link rot than government websites and thus would require further upkeep — which would be wasted as users are far more likely to just use a search engine.
- Borderline doxxing as LinkedIn is intended for employment purposes only, and not for advocacy about issues, customer support questions, or whatever.
- Those are my thoughts on the matter. — Sojourna (talk) 04:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- I also think it is doxxing Andrew V (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)