Home Wiki

Newag

Last updated View on consumerrights.wiki ↗

Contents9
  1. Background
  2. Incidents
  3. 2023 disclosure of anti-repair software locks in Impuls trains
  4. Newag response
  5. Regulatory and criminal investigations
  6. 2024 lawsuits against SPS and Dragon Sector
  7. Right to repair significance
  8. See also
  9. References
Newag
Basic information
Founded 1876
Legal Structure Public
Industry Railway
Also known as Newag S.A.,NWG
Official website https://www.newag.pl/

Newag S.A. is a publicly traded Polish manufacturer of railway rolling stock based in Nowy Sącz.[1] Between 2022 & 2023, independent researchers found that its Impuls electric multiple units stopped running after being serviced at third-party workshops because the trains' onboard software contained routines that locked them out.[2][3] Newag denies installing any locks, calls the findings defamatory, & has sued the repair firm & the researchers who published them.[4][5]

Background

Newag traces its origins to an 1876 railway repair works in Nowy Sącz & now designs, builds, & modernizes rolling stock as a public company listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange under the ticker NWG.[1][6] Its main products are the Griffin & Dragon electric locomotive families & the Impuls family of multiple units.[7][8][9]

Incidents

This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Newag category.

2023 disclosure of anti-repair software locks in Impuls trains

Main article: 2023 Newag Impuls software locks

In 2022, independent maintenance firm Serwis Pojazdów Szynowych (SPS Mieczkowski) took in Koleje Dolnośląskie Impuls units for scheduled overhauls, & the trains refused to start once the work was done even though nothing was mechanically wrong.[10][2] SPS hired the Polish security collective Dragon Sector, & three of its members, Michał "Redford" Kowalczyk, Sergiusz "q3k" Bazański, & Jakub "MrTick" Stępniewicz, reverse engineered the trains' programmable logic controllers.[11][2]

The decompiled code contained several conditions that would disable a train.[12][2] One controller held hardcoded GPS coordinates, & one pair, 53.13845 & 17.99011, resolves to a site next to Bydgoszcz Główna station used by the competing manufacturer PESA; a train that sat inside such a geofence was blocked from moving.[2] Another routine disabled a unit that had stood still in a workshop for at least 10 days, a threshold a later Newag firmware update raised to 21 days.[2][5] The software also paired components by serial number over the CAN bus, so replacing a part with an identical working unit locked the train, & separate date logic reported a false compressor fault once the calendar passed a fixed date.[2] Because the compressor raises the pantograph that draws power from the overhead line, that fault left the train unable to move.[2]

Pseudocode of the geofence check published in the Zaufana Trzecia Strona investigation, showing the hardcoded coordinate pair 53.13845 and 17.99011 that pins a workshop next to competitor PESA in Bydgoszcz.[2]

The locks left no diagnostic error on the cabin screen; the train read as ready, released its brakes on command, & then would not engage the traction motors.[2][13] Dragon Sector found that an undocumented sequence of button presses in the cab cleared the lock, though a Newag update later removed that sequence while leaving the lock logic in place, & added cabin messages warning of a copyright violation.[12][2] One controller was wired to a GSM modem through a device labeled a UDP to CAN converter that broadcast the lock state, which Bazański said appeared able to lock a train remotely.[12][2] Dragon Sector analyzed the software of 29 Impuls units & found the lock routines across a fleet operated by carriers including Koleje Dolnośląskie, Koleje Mazowieckie, POLREGIO, & SKM.[2][14] The team presented the work at the 37C3 congress in December 2023 & published a follow-up on the legal fallout at 38C3 a year later.[13][15]

Newag response

Newag denies installing any lockout, geofence, or timer, & describes the reports as slander from competitors.[4][14][16]

A page from Newag's copyright suit quoting the company's filing that No modified Software was installed as part of actions undertaken by Dragon Sector, contradicting its public claim that competitors had tampered with the software.[17]

After the findings were published on December 5, 2023, its share price fell by as much as 17% before closing the day down about 6%, & the company said the report amounted to manipulation of its share price.[16] Newag's public position is that its software was altered without authorization by a third party.[4] That account sits against its own court filing, which states that no altered software was installed as part of Dragon Sector's work; iFixit noted that Newag simultaneously argues the researchers endangered passengers by modifying the software & that they did not modify it at all.[17][5]

Regulatory and criminal investigations

The President of Poland's Office of Competition & Consumer Protection (UOKiK), Tomasz Chróstny, opened an explanatory proceeding on December 7, 2023, at the request of Razem party members of parliament Paulina Matysiak & Adrian Zandberg, to examine whether Newag restricted competition in the market for train servicing.[18][14] The Regional Prosecutor's Office in Kraków opened a separate criminal investigation, & in 2024 prosecutors & police searched Newag's headquarters in Nowy Sącz to secure records.[14][19]

Coverage of UOKiK president Tomasz Chróstny opening an explanatory proceeding on December 7, 2023 into whether Newag restricted competition in Impuls train servicing, at the request of Razem party members of parliament.[20]

2024 lawsuits against SPS and Dragon Sector

In August 2024, Newag began legal action against SPS & the Dragon Sector researchers, seeking damages for copyright infringement, unfair competition, & harm to its reputation.[17][5][21]

Techdirt's coverage of Newag's suits seeking $1.7 million for copyright violations and unlawful competition in one court and $1.36 million in another.[21]

The claims were split across two courts, one seeking about $1.7 million & the other about $1.36 million.[21] Newag's filing bases the copyright claim on the researchers decompiling its train software rather than on any change to the code, which its own filing says was not altered.[17][5] iFixit & Techdirt framed the suits as Newag targeting the people who exposed the locks, & the researchers detailed the litigation & their legal defense in their 38C3 talk.[5][21][15] As of August 2025 the litigation remained ongoing.[21]

Right to repair significance

iFixit & Techdirt covered the case as a right to repair dispute, reporting that Newag used software locks & copyright claims against the researchers who exposed them.[5][21] iFixit wrote that the copyright claim rests on the researchers reverse engineering the train software.[5]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Company factsheet". GPW. Archived from the original on 7 Apr 2026. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Haertle, Adam (5 Dec 2023). "O trzech takich, co zhakowali prawdziwy pociąg a nawet 30 pociągów" [About three guys who hacked a real train, and even 30 of them]. Zaufana Trzecia Strona (in polski). Archived from the original on 12 Jul 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  3. "Manufacturer deliberately bricked trains repaired by competitors, hackers find". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 5 Nov 2025. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 "Newag comes out fighting in claims over foul play". International Railway Journal. Archived from the original on 16 Feb 2026. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 "Polish Train Maker Is Suing the Hackers Who Exposed Its Anti-Repair Tricks". iFixit. 28 Jul 2025. Archived from the original on 2 Mar 2026. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  6. "Company history". Newag. Archived from the original on 20 Jan 2025. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  7. "Griffin". Newag. Archived from the original on 25 Jan 2025. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  8. "Dragon". Newag. Archived from the original on 9 Feb 2025. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  9. "Impuls". Newag. Archived from the original on 12 Jan 2025. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  10. "Dieselgate but for trains, some heavyweight hardware hacking". Bad Cyber. Archived from the original on 22 Feb 2026. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  11. "Polish train maker denies claims it geofenced trains to force use of its repair shops". The Register. Archived from the original on 16 July 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Bazański, Sergiusz (5 Dec 2023). "I can finally reveal some research I've been involved with over the past year or so". Warsaw Hackerspace Social (Mastodon). Archived from the original on 16 Jul 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Bazański, Sergiusz; Kowalczyk, Michał (27 Dec 2023). "Breaking "DRM" in Polish trains". media.ccc.de. Chaos Computer Club. Archived from the original on 16 Jul 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 "Newaggate, antitrust and law enforcement authorities to investigate the case". RollingStock. 20 Dec 2023. Archived from the original on 16 Jul 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  15. 15.0 15.1 "We've not been trained for this, life after the Newag DRM disclosure". media.ccc.de. Chaos Computer Club. 28 Dec 2024. Archived from the original on 16 Jan 2026. Retrieved 1 Mar 2026.
  16. 16.0 16.1 "Polish manufacturer accused of programming failures into its trains to gain more servicing business". Notes from Poland. 6 Dec 2023. Archived from the original on 26 Dec 2025. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 Woźniak, Michał. "Newag admits, Dragon Sector hackers did not modify software in Impuls trains". rys.io. Archived from the original on 3 Jul 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  18. Madrjas, Jakub (18 Dec 2023). "UOKiK wszczął postępowanie w sprawie Newagu" [UOKiK opened a proceeding in the Newag case]. Rynek Kolejowy (in polski). Archived from the original on 17 June 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  19. Woźniak, Adam (14 Feb 2024). "Tajemnicze awarie pociągów Newagu. Prokurator z policją weszli do siedziby spółki" [Mysterious Newag train failures. A prosecutor and police entered the company's headquarters]. Rzeczpospolita (in polski). Archived from the original on 4 Dec 2025. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  20. "UOKiK wszczął postępowanie w sprawie Newagu" [UOKiK opened a proceeding in the Newag case]. Rynek Kolejowy (in polski). 2023-12-18. Archived from the original on 12 May 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 21.5 Bode, Karl (19 Aug 2025). "Train Maker Sues Hackers For Exposing Dodgy Efforts To Make Train Repairs More Difficult". Techdirt. Archived from the original on 8 Mar 2026. Retrieved 8 Jul 2026.
Filed under