Home Wiki

Logitech webcams

View on consumerrights.wiki ↗

Work in progress
This article has been flagged for additional work. Treat its claims as provisional.
Verification concerns
Editors have raised concerns about the verifiability of one or more claims.
Contents4
  1. Consumer impact summary
  2. Testing
  3. See also
  4. References

🧽🫧Article Status Notice: This Article needs to be cleaned up


This article contains sources and content, but is lacking proper format and needs more development to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and provide a high quality and consistent experience for readers. Learn more ▼

Issues may include:

  • The article is not following the correct outline for its subject (i.e. incident, company, product)
  • This article contains references that do not utilize the <ref></ref> tags or Cite web template.
  • The article has "WIP" mentioned next to content
  • A quote longer than two sentences does not use the Quote template.

How you can help:

  • Copy and paste the layout from the aforementioned preload templates (depending on the article's topic)
  • Take URLs, convert them for the Cite web template, and insert them into the correct sentence where the source can verify a claim.
  • Remove personal notes left by editors either with <!-- [text here] --> in source editor or when the article is close to being fully cleaned up.
  • Flesh out the article with relevant information

This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:

  1. No use of first person; this is not a review website
  2. Use Template:Cite web for references

This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼

This Article Requires Additional Verification

This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!

Why This Article Is In Question

Articles in this wiki are required to:

  • Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
  • Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
  • Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.

Examples of issues that trigger this notice:

  • A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
  • Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
  • Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.
How You Can Improve This Article

To address verification concerns:

  • Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
  • Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
  • Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
    • Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
    • Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.

If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.


Logitech webcams
Basic Information
Release Year 2012
Product Type Cameras
In Production Yes
Official Website https://www.logitech.com/en-us/products/webcams/c930e-business-webcam.960-000971.html


I just bought C930e. To my surprise unlike my old c920 it does not have h264 hardware encoding. Using mjpeg makes video more noisy. In the internet people are reporting that at some point logitech removed this feature from their products. So basically new C9XX can be different product than old C9XX.

Consumer impact summary

Overview of concerns that arise from the conduct towards users of the product (if applicable):

  • User Freedom
  • User Privacy
  • Business Model
  • Market Control

Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


  • Feature removal
  • False advertising


H264 encoding feature removed at some point. MJPEG has a lower quality and lots of noise. Uncompressed stream does not handle 30fps in 1920x1080.

The model numbers were not changed to reflect degradation.

The website still claims it has this capability.

https://www.logitech.com/en-us/products/webcams/c920e-business-webcam.960-001401.html?sp=1&searchclick=Logitech#specs

The only article from logitech was removed:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220219224240/https://www.logitech.com/en-us/video-collaboration/resources/think-tank/articles/article-logitech-and-h264-encoding.html

Testing

# To display all codecs:
v4l2-ctl --info --list-formats -d /dev/video2

Driver Info:
	Driver name      : uvcvideo
	Card type        : Logitech Webcam C930e
	Bus info         : usb-0000:00:14.0-4
	Driver version   : 6.1.140
	Capabilities     : 0x84a00001
...
	Type: Video Capture
	[0]: 'YUYV' (YUYV 4:2:2)
	[1]: 'MJPG' (Motion-JPEG, compressed)
# To display all resolutions/fps:
v4l2-ctl --info --list-formats-ext -d /dev/video2

See also

https://en.everybodywiki.com/List_of_cameras_with_onboard_video_compression

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1229986/wrong-webcam-driver

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/f2icry/psa_logitech_has_removed_hardware_h264_encoder/

https://www.reddit.com/r/logitech/comments/14cmrbt/difference_between_three_revisions_of_c920_webcam/

Article by Logitech is now removed from their website:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220219224240/https://www.logitech.com/en-us/video-collaboration/resources/think-tank/articles/article-logitech-and-h264-encoding.html

https://support.logi.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360036050333-Why-don-t-we-use-H-264

References