HomeWiki

Legal lockout

Last updatedView on consumerrights.wiki ↗

Contents6
  1. Impact
  2. Examples
  3. Activision Blizzard account lock and forced arbitration
  4. Smartwool adds forced arbitration to EULA
  5. See also
  6. References

Legal lockout is a form of rights stripping in which terms are implemented that modify users' legal rights or access to legal remedies. A common legal lockout practice is to implement forced arbitration of some kind.

Impact

Legal lockout removes or narrows a consumer's ability to use the court system after a purchase: arbitration clauses move disputes out of courts and into private arbitration, and are often paired with class-action waivers, meaning consumers must pursue claims alone. Because the terms are frequently presented as accept-or-lose-access conditions on existing products, consumers who decline have no way to keep using what they already paid for.[1]

Examples

Activision Blizzard account lock and forced arbitration

Main article: Activision Blizzard account lock and forced arbitration

A Battle.net update in March 2024 required users to accept updated EULA terms including forced arbitration, or lose access to their accounts and purchased game libraries.

Smartwool adds forced arbitration to EULA

Main article: Smartwool adds forced arbitration to EULA

In March 2024, Smartwool e-mailed customers new terms of use containing a forced arbitration clause, automatically opting them in unless they opted out by mail within 30 days.

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Blizzard End User License Agreement". Blizzard. Retrieved 2026-10-22.