Digital Fairness Act
⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete
This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:
- needs more reliable sources (outside of official website)
- Needs to use <ref></ref> tags for references with Template:Cite web
This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals channel.
Learn more ▼
This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!
Articles in this wiki are required to:
- Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
- Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
- Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.
Examples of issues that trigger this notice:
- A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
- Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
- Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.
To address verification concerns:
- Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
- Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
- Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
- Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
- Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.
The Digital Fairness Act is an upcoming legislative proposal from the European Union by Michael McGrath, Commissioner for Democracy, Justice and Rule of Law. The Commission acknowledged the potential need for a Digital Fairness Act in their final report on the Digital Fairness Fitness Check published on October 3rd 2024. The European Parliament called for the need for additional consumer protections regarding addictive design on digital platforms in their Resolution on Addictive Design adopted on December 12th 2023. These two key documents (Commission’s report on Digital fairness, and Parliament’s resolution on Addictive design) are expected to be used as the basis for the Digital Fairness Act.
Objective of the proposal
The main objective of this proposal is to improve consumer protection in the online environment focusing on:
- preventing traders from using dark patterns and other unfair techniques that pressure, deceive and manipulate consumers online;
- giving consumers greater control of their online experience by addressing addictive design features that lead consumers, particularly minors, to spend excessive time and money on online goods and services;
- addressing problematic features of digital products such as in video games, in particular as concerns their impact on minors;
- addressing problematic personalization practices, including situations where consumer vulnerabilities are targeted for the purposes of personalized advertising and pricing;
- preventing harmful practices by influencers (e.g. the lack of disclosure of commercial communications, the promotion of harmful products to their followers and clarifying the responsibilities of the companies that collaborate with them);
- addressing unfair practices related to the price (e.g. “drip” pricing, “starting from” prices if the trader applies dynamic pricing, percentage/value discounts that mislead the consumer as to the nature of the promotion);
- addressing problems with digital contracts (e.g. difficult cancellations of subscriptions, auto-renewals or free trials converted into paid subscriptions, use of chatbots for customer service).
Timeline
The DFA is being worked on since the end of 2020 and is the current the Consumer Agenda flagship targeting to publish the proposal in the first half of 2026 .[1]
The commission opened a public consultation[2] to take place between 17 July 2025 and 24 October 2025