CRW

Home Wiki

Ars Technica fake AI article on AI accusations

Last updated View on consumerrights.wiki ↗

Work in progress
This article has been flagged for additional work. Treat its claims as provisional.
Stub
This article is a stub. The wiki community is still building it out.
Verification concerns
Editors have raised concerns about the verifiability of one or more claims.
Contents5
  1. Background
  2. Incident
  3. Ars Technica's response
  4. Consumer response
  5. References

❗This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

🧽🫧This article needs cleanup. It contains sources and content but lacks proper formatting/structure.

More info ▼

Common issues include not following the correct preload outline (incident, company, product), references that don't use <ref></ref> or Cite web, leftover "WIP" markers, or long quotes not wrapped in Quote. You can help by applying the relevant preload sections, converting raw URLs into proper citations, and removing editor notes.

Ars Technica published an article[1] on a programmer who was being "bullied" by an AI autonomous agent. The article was written using AI, with non-existent quotations. The article was later removed and Ars Technica published an editor's note[2] explaining what happened.

Background

Scott Shambaugh (contributor of the matplotlib library on GitHub) created a good first issue/first contribution [check needed here of which one was it, seems to be the same for this repo], and got an OpenClaw agent pull request[3] as fix for the issue. The pull request got closed, the AI Agent got mad, so the AI Agent generated a post on its blog[4], and also Scott wrote a blog post. [5]

Incident

Ars Technica (authors listed are "Benj Edwards and Kyle Orland") wrote an article on the situation, but the hit piece contained AI hallucinated quotations.

Ars Technica's response

The Ars Technica's staff wrote an Editor’s Note explaining briefly explaining what happened. The article author also wrote an apology on BlueSky[6]

Consumer response

Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.

Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


References

  1. ↑ Ars Staff (2026-02-13). "Retraction: After a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by name". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 2026-02-13.
  2. ↑ Fisher, Ken (2026-02-15). "Editor's Note: Retraction of article containing fabricated quotations". Ars Technica.
  3. ↑ crabby-rathbun (2026-02-10). "[PERF] Replace np.column_stack with np.vstack().T". GitHub.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. ↑ crabby-rathbun (2026-02-11). "Commit 83b7d60". GitHub.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. ↑ Shambaugh, Scott (2026-02-12). "An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me". The Shamblog.
  6. ↑ Edwards, Benj (2026-02-15). "Apology". Bluesky. Sorry all this is my fault; and speculation has grown worse because I have been sick in bed with a high fever and unable to reliably address it (still am sick) I was told by management not to comment until they did. Here is my statement in images below arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Filed under