Home Wiki

ADDW car systems legislated in the EU

View on consumerrights.wiki ↗

Work in progress
This article has been flagged for additional work. Treat its claims as provisional.
Stub
This article is a stub. The wiki community is still building it out.
Contents3
  1. How it works
  2. Why it is a problem
  3. References

Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub


This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼

Issues may include:

  • This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
  • This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
  • More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
  • The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
  • The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content

How you can help:

  • Add documented examples with verifiable sources
  • Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
  • Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
  • Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
  • Flesh out the article with relevant information

This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.

The European Union (EU) has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced for sale within the EU[1] (Article 6 clause D).

How it works

From 7 July 2026 onward, all new vehicles sold within the EU must contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify them accordingly in case of improper driving conduct - something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from 7 July 2024[2]. This is on par with the goal that the EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half, compared to 2019[3].

The cameras are meant to monitor the driver's gaze, which could result in a warning if it is not directed at the areas that are specified in[2] (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).

The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system should be contained within a closed loop and may not be made available to 3rd parties. In addition, no data should be collected except that which is necessary to perform the task, and all collected data must be deleted after processing[2] (Article 6 clause 3).

Why it is a problem

With such legislation, privacy concerns are a major issue.

Although the data falls under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU has established strong rules, the question remains how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as these technologies become more widespread and are used on a daily basis.

Based on past incidents, these concerns are well-founded. For example, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats[4][5][6].

Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices[7][8].

Adding to this, NOYB, which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and 74.4% of them agree that the average company has relevant GDPR violations[9].

References

  1. "Regulation (EU) 2019/2144". EUR-Lex. 16 Dec 2019. Archived from the original on 2026-01-05. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 "ADDW specifications". EUR-Lex. Archived from the original on 2026-01-04. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  3. "European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030". European Commission. 28 Oct 2021. Archived from the original on 2026-01-04. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  4. Stecklow, Steve; Cunningham, Waylon; Jin, Hyunjoo (7 Apr 2023). Hirschberg, Peter (ed.). "Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars". Reuters. Archived from the original on 29 Jan 2026. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  5. "Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars". Dawn. 8 Apr 2023. Archived from the original on 2026-01-04. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  6. Brodkin, John (6 Apr 2023). "Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including "scenes of intimacy"". ArsTechnica. Archived from the original on 2025-08-30. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  7. Caltrider, Jen; Rykov, Misha; MacDonald, Zoë (6 Sep 2023). "It's Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy". Mozilla Foundation. Archived from the original on 2025-08-04. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  8. Katharine, Kemp (20 Nov 2024). "Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report". unsw.edu.au. Archived from the original on 2025-07-13. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
  9. "GDPR a culture of non-compliance?" (PDF). noyb. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-08-01. Retrieved 28 Jul 2025.
Filed under